900 Pages of Paperwork Created In Oregon Case

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

July 1, 2009 by   - () 3 Comments

A seasonal campground at Hyatt Lake in Oregon has been illegally converted into a year-round, high-density recreational vehicle park, a Greensprings neighborhood group charged during a Jackson County public hearing Monday (June 29). 

"It has morphed into what I would call an immobile home park," said Medford resident Brad Inman, who formerly lived at Hyatt Lake. 

The neighbors have appealed Jackson County planning approval of a limited expansion at Hyatt Lake Resort, which is operated by the same group as nearby Campers Cove. Owners of the resort, known as Campers Cove Resort LLC, also have appealed the planning decision, saying they are entitled to the changes they've requested, according to the Medford Mail Tribune

The owners want to install park models on 35 spaces, but county planners determined they actually are entitled to only 22 spaces that can have water, electricity and sewage hook-ups. 

Hearings officer Dan Rubenstein is wading through 900 pages of planning documents as well as other evidence presented at the public hearing, which will be followed by a six-week rebuttal period. He is expected to make a decision by Sept. 25. 

Bob McNeely, one of the resort owners, said he's already sold units on the 22 recreational vehicle sites and was in the process of selling four on the 13 contested sites when he got shut down by the county.

McNeely has been given tentative approval for some of the changes he's requested. County planners supported expanding the deck off the restaurant, reconstructing the bait shop, reconstructing four cabins without kitchens, upgrading a shop building and upgrading a shower building. 

McNeely wanted a total of 65 RV spaces at the resort, but dropped that number to 57 Monday. The resort is on his land and on land he leases from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. Many of the RV spaces have only limited services. 

The property is zoned "forest reserve" and the development on the property is considered non-conforming, requiring a higher level of scrutiny by planning staff. The owners also have to prove that any changes to the property don't have a significant impact on the surrounding neighborhood. 

"Historically the use of the campground was as a campground," said Pamela Hardy, a Bend lawyer who represents the newly formed group Southern Oregon Citizens for Responsible Land Use Planning. "It was not a residential development as you have here." 

Jay Harland of CSA Planning Ltd. of Medford, which represents Campers Cove LLC, said he had a hard time swallowing Hardy's argument. 

"It was an RV park before and it is an RV park after," he said. 

Much of the discussion revolved around the type of recreational vehicle Campers Cover was installing. Many residents said these small cabins are attracting people to the resort year-round rather than just seasonally. The cabins are sold, but the resort then rents them out for the owners. 

Glenn Munsell, who lives on Hyatt Prairie Road, said the owners have already run afoul of county laws, pointing out that one manufactured dwelling has been placed on the property without permits. "It's presently being used as an office or administrative business," he said. 

Planning staff confirmed that the building had been in violation of county codes. However, a storage permit was issued that allowed the owners to continue to keep the building on the property, but not use it for offices. But planning staff indicated the permit may have expired. 

McNeely, who also is one of the owners of the company that builds the recreational vehicles on the property, responded to neighbors' complaints about sewage, water, fire hazards and other problems. His representatives also provided seven letters from surrounding property owners in favor of the improvements to the resort. 

McNeely said his sewage-treatment operation and leach fields are more than adequate to handle the 35 RVs planned. According to regulations, he said he needs to have a facility that can handle 100 gallons a day from each RV. However, he anticipated each RV would generate only about 46.7 gallons, based on usage at his Brookings RV park. 

He said Hyatt Lake Resort has adequate water, and he has reduced the fire danger by removing underbrush, cutting off tree limbs and having two fire trucks on site. 

McNeely, who said he has no permanent residents at the resort, said his recreational vehicles have the same state stamp as any other RV. He said it doesn't make sense that neighbors would want $500,000 RVs driving up the mountain and pulling into his spaces, rather than having the units he's already installed. 

"They're saying, we want you to put a Chevy in there, but we don't want a Cadillac," he said.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [Facebook] [Google] [StumbleUpon]


3 Responses to “900 Pages of Paperwork Created In Oregon Case”

  1. Jay Vaughn on August 22nd, 2009 5:39 am

    We are here at Woodall's reccomended Dunromin Campground in Annapolis Royal, NS, Canada. Our neighbor in a pop-up camper started dumping his sewer on the ground yesterday and I called the management who came over in a few minutes. He talked to the camper and a few minutes late dumped more sewer on the ground and had continued to dump sewer until leaving a few minutes ago.
    Evidently it is okay to dump sewer at your campsite, no matter about the complaints from neighbors. If I decide to camp at a Woodall's reccomended campground again, I will ask if dumping on the ground is okay.
    This really stinks!

  2. Dave Lewis on September 15th, 2009 9:36 pm

    Dave Lewis worked on building these cabins for Bob McNeely and Jeannie Plante. Violations were reported to the County and are currently under investigation. Beware investing, visiting, or staying at " Mountain Resort at Hyatt Lake," or "Campers Cove." What was once a nice camp ground is now wall to wall cabins and lots of trouble !

  3. Pete Amaral on October 19th, 2009 4:51 pm

    The decision by Oregon is another de facto ruling that all park models are manufactured homes and cannot be classified as an RV. The decision is based on a recent decision that says that although not "categorically" ruling the a park model is not an RV, it is not RV. These are decisions that should have all park model manufacturers crying "foul."
    The previous comment by "Dave Lewis" refers to a website that notes he died in October 2008.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!