Top

California Parks Audit Reveals More Issues

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

February 15, 2013 by   - () Leave a Comment

A new probe of financial scandals at the California Department of Parks and Recreation found that officials maintained a hidden cash surplus for as long as 20 years – far longer than previously known.

The investigation by the California state auditor, released Thursday (Feb. 14), tracked a surplus going back to 1993 in the State Parks and Recreation Fund, the primary fund that collects and disburses revenue generated by the 278 state parks, the Sacramento Bee reported.

The Bee first reported in July that department officials maintained a secret surplus in this fund which at the time amounted to $20 million. Although the surplus amount varied over time, no evidence has emerged that the money was spent illegally.

High-ranking officials at state parks headquarters stayed quiet about the surplus even as the department moved to close 70 parks, for the first time in history, to achieve state budget savings. The surplus would have been enough to avoid these cuts.

In the months since the scandal, the leadership staff at park headquarters has been replaced, and the Legislature and governor have approved a plan to spend the $20 million surplus on park operations.

The surplus existed because department officials routinely reported different fund totals to the State Controller's Office and the Department of Finance in violation of state accounting rules.

But like other recent investigations – completed by the Department of Finance, the Controller's Office and the attorney general's office – the state auditor was unable to explain how the surplus accumulated in the first place.

"Neither current staff nor documentation we reviewed in the department's accounting and budget files had an explanation for what originally caused the differences or why the issue was never resolved," investigators wrote.

The Department of Finance on numerous occasions between 1999 and 2003 warned parks officials that they were reporting improper fund balances, according to the latest audit. Those warnings were ignored, and then mysteriously stopped coming from finance officials in subsequent years.

Last year, after the hidden funds were revealed, the Finance Department imposed a new rule stating that department heads are now required to certify – under penalty of perjury – that the accounting information they report is accurate.

"We had relied on departments and agencies to accurately report fund balances to Finance as we prepared budgets in the fall," said Finance Department spokesman H.D. Palmer. "In the case of Parks, not only was that not the case – there was deliberate under-reporting."

The audit also shed light on a criticism that emerged in 2011, when Parks and Recreation was courting nonprofits and local governments to take over some of the 70 parks slated for closure. Many of those groups complained that the department could not tell them how much it cost to operate any single park, because its accounting system tracks expenses only at the district level.

This greatly complicated those groups' efforts to figure out how much money they had to raise from donors to take over operations and keep a park from closing.

Nearly all the parks avoided closure nonetheless, because enough local groups took a leap of faith and agreed to operate parks without knowing how much it would actually cost.

The problematic budgeting didn't stop there. The audit also found that the parks agency is unable to state with certainty how much it costs to operate all 278 parks.

As a result of these findings, the auditor concluded that the department was "premature" in deciding which 70 parks to close – given it could not demonstrate that the closures would actually save the required money. In addition, it found that the cost estimates officials did rely on were as much as a decade old.

 

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [Facebook] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Comments

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





*

Bottom