Top

Suit Trying To Stop Hebgen Lake Logging Work

Hebgen Lake

Two Montana conservation groups are suing to halt a proposed logging project north of Hebgen Lake that abuts the western edge of Yellowstone National Park, according to the Montana Standard.

The project, proposed by Custer Gallatin National Forest, would log or thin about 5,600 acres.

“It’s unfortunate but not surprising given who filed, and they file on all of our projects,” said Jason Brey, Hebgen District ranger. “It does hold up some very important work related to fuels reduction and wildlife habitat.”

Native Ecosystems Council and Alliance for the Wild Rockies filed the lawsuit in Federal District Court in Missoula on Tuesday (May 15).

The Forest Service has touted the project as a way to better protect about 500 homes, a public campground, roads and power lines in the area. The work was also designed to enhance aspen and whitebark pine stands deeper in the forest on upper Tepee Creek Road, which is an inventoried roadless area. Around Rainbow Point Campground, one of the busiest in the Northern Region, tree thinning is meant to reduce human-grizzly bear encounters.

Under the plan about 3,610 acres would be harvested, and 2,060 acres will be thinned. Fifteen miles of temporary road would be constructed. Work began on the project in 2011. It is expected that completion may take eight to 12 years.

At the basis of the conservation group’s lawsuit is a challenge to the implementation of Amendment 51 to the Gallatin National Forest Plan.

“In general, the primary reason for this proposed amendment is to remove or correct outdated, ineffective or unnecessary direction from the Gallatin Forest Plan,” Brey said.

The plaintiffs argue that the Forest Service implemented the amendment in 2015 to “get around existing, legally enforceable protections for wildlife and endangered ecosystems,” according to their email. Implementation of the amendment “modified 56 goals and standards in the Forest Plan.”

One of those goals was to “‘provide habitat for viable populations of all indigenous wildlife species and for increasing populations of big game animals,'” said Sara Jane Johnson, director of Native Ecosystems Council, in the email. “This was the only provision requiring viable wildlife populations, and now it is gone.”

To read more on this story click here.

Comments

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Bottom